NOT KNOWN FACTS ABOUT H4831 VS H4831SC

Not known Facts About h4831 vs h4831sc

Not known Facts About h4831 vs h4831sc

Blog Article

I gave up on it and went to other powder once the new powder was building far more tension and was slower as opposed to outdated things. I do not keep in mind if I even experimented with standard h4831 or not; I am imagining not.

They're the exact same thing, but H4831 sc is Slash shorter so it'll pack into a scenario less complicated then the normal, and in some cases like our 7mm rem mag it makes it possible for us to incorporate extra powder then just the conventional H4831.

Can they be interchanged without problems other then making use of typical load practices when switching from large amount to large amount?

I have experienced several rifles that fouled really lousy. Acquiring many of the copper out was a true PIA until finally I found Wipe-Out foaming bore cleaner.

Alaska The sc loads up a tad much better but They are really the exact same matter, just one is just limited Lower. I’ve even blended the normal a single with the SC and gotten a similar final results as applying a single or the opposite.

I realize, rough instances. H4831SC will certainly work, I just failed to like the situation density when loaded lengthy. I do not keep in mind powder demand off the top of my head but I was launching a Berger 168gr VLD at 3,000fps which can be wherever I commonly purpose to generally be. Within your scenario employing what you have (and what I should h4831sc load data have completed) I'd begin with the top with the bearing surface area with the bullet proper on the shoulder/neck junction, and flirt with extending seating depths from there after you find a velocity node.

Hodgdon H4831SC (Brief Slice) extruded rifle propellant is really a best option for big video game hunters who use handloader rifles. Launched inside the nineteen fifties, this propellant continues to be enhanced with shorter grain dimensions which will allow greater powder move and even more uniformity.

The SC or SSC specified powders Generally permit for larger load density, so you can commonly get a tad additional powder inside a provided scenario when utilizing compressed loads. Use of a fall tube can even further maximize this advantage.

WA I'd advise a slower burner that could give better case density like H1000 or IMR 7977, particularly when you might be loading heavies extensive.

locutus mentioned: I however have a great stockpile of H450, the ball powder equivalent of 4831, which flows as a result of my powder steps effortlessly.

Kansas Town, MO I'd grab no matter what is available at the moment. I’ve used h4831sc load data both of those however with my head over to load and didn’t see everything distinct functionality wise.

Back again to aged website Close If there is anything within your cart, it won't be brought about for the aged web-site.

Southwest Idaho I tried H4831sc in my three hundred WM but had significantly better velocity and precision with H1000. I might somewhat utilize a slower burning powder with 215g drugs.

IMR4831 and H4831SC are unique. In which you might be baffling it and thinking that it is actually shut is H4831 and H4831SC are certainly comparable. These two are essentially the exact same except H4831SC is h4831 vs h4831sc built to more compact grains so it meters easier.

Report this page